[ad_1]
Article content
According to an announcement last week by Premier Danielle Smith, the Alberta government will use the Alberta Sovereignty within a United Canada Act to challenge Ottawa’s proposal to cap greenhouse gas emissions from the oil and gas sector at 35% below 2019 levels by 2030.
Advertisement 2
Article content
Article content
Article content
Premier Smith, who said the cap will harm the economy and represents an overstep of federal authority, also plans to prevent emissions data from individual oil and gas companies from being shared with Ottawa. While the federal government said the cap is necessary to fight climate change, several studies suggest the cap will impose significant costs on Canadians without yielding detectable environmental benefits. According to a recent report by Deloitte, a leading audit and consulting firm, the cap will force Canadian firms to curtail oil production by 626,000 barrels per day by 2030 or by approximately 10% of the expected production — and curtail gas production by approximately 12%.
Deloitte estimates Alberta will be hit hardest, with 3.6% less investment, almost 70,000 fewer jobs, and a 4.5% decrease in the province’s economic output (i.e. GDP) by 2040. Ontario will lose 15,000 jobs and $2.3 billion from its economy by 2040. And Quebec will lose more than 3,000 jobs and $0.4 billion from its economy during the same period.
Calgary Sun Headline News
Article content
Advertisement 3
Article content
Overall, the country will experience an economic loss equivalent to 1% of the value of the entire economy (GDP), translating into lower wages, the loss of nearly 113,000 jobs and a 1.3% reduction in government tax revenues. Canada’s inflation-adjusted GDP growth in 2023 was a paltry 1.3%, so a 1% reduction would be a significant economic loss. Deloitte’s findings echo previous studies. According to a recent analysis by the Conference Board of Canada think-tank, the cap could reduce Canada’s GDP by up to $1 trillion between 2030 and 2040, eliminate up to 151,000 jobs by 2030, reduce federal government revenue by up to $151 billion between 2030 and 2040, and reduce Alberta government revenue by up to $127 billion over the same period. Similarly, another recent study published by the Fraser Institute found the cap would reduce production and exports, leading to at least $45 billion in lost economic activity in 2030 alone, accompanied by a substantial drop in government revenue.
Advertisement 4
Article content
Crucially, these huge economic costs to Canadians will come without any discernable environmental benefits. Even if Canada entirely shut down its oil and gas industry by 2030, eliminating all GHG emissions from the sector, the resulting reduction in global GHG emissions would amount to a mere four-tenths of 1% with virtually no impact on the climate or any detectable environmental, health or safety benefits. Given the demand for fossil fuels, constraining oil and gas production and exports in Canada would likely merely shift production to other countries with lower environmental and human rights standards such as Iran, Russia and Venezuela. Consequently, global GHG emissions would increase, not decrease. No other major oil and gas-producing country has imposed a similar cap on its leading export sector.
The Trudeau government’s proposed cap, which still must pass the House and Senate, would further strain an already struggling Canadian economy, and to make matters worse, do virtually nothing to improve the environment. The government should cancel the cap plan given the economic costs and nonexistent environmental benefits.
Julio Mejia, Elmira Aliakbari and Tegan Hill are analysts at the Fraser Institute.
Article content
